Home/Wallets/Leather (formerly Hiro) vs MetaMask
Wallets Comparison ยท 2026

Leather (formerly Hiro) vs MetaMask

Which is better in 2026? We compare Leather (formerly Hiro) and MetaMask side by side โ€” pricing, features, pros & cons โ€” so you can choose the right Wallets tool.

๐Ÿ† MetaMask has the higher rating (4.4/5)
L

Leather (formerly Hiro)

โ˜…4.1

Bitcoin and Stacks wallet for managing BTC, STX, Ordinals, and BRC-20 tokens. Focused on the Bitcoin smart contract ecosystem.

PricingFree
CategoryWallets
Rating4.1/5
๐Ÿ† Higher Rated
M

MetaMask

โ˜…4.4

The most widely used Ethereum wallet and gateway to Web3. Browser extension and mobile app supporting all EVM-compatible chains with built-in swaps and bridges.

PricingFree
CategoryWallets
Rating4.4/5

Feature Comparison

FeatureLeather (formerly Hiro)MetaMask
Bitcoin + Stacks supportโœ“โ€”
Ordinals managementโœ“โ€”
BRC-20 tokensโœ“โ€”
Browser extensionโœ“โœ“
Stacks DeFi accessโœ“โ€”
NFT displayโœ“โ€”
EVM chain supportโ€”โœ“
Built-in swap aggregatorโ€”โœ“
Bridge integrationโ€”โœ“
Mobile appโ€”โœ“
Hardware wallet supportโ€”โœ“
Snaps extensibilityโ€”โœ“

Pricing Comparison

Leather (formerly Hiro)

Free

Completely free to use with no paid tiers.

View pricing โ†’

MetaMask

Free

Completely free to use with no paid tiers.

View pricing โ†’

Pros & Cons

Leather (formerly Hiro)

๐Ÿ‘ Pros

  • +Core Stacks ecosystem wallet
  • +Good Ordinals support
  • +Open source
  • +Clean design

๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons

  • โˆ’Limited to BTC/Stacks
  • โˆ’Smaller team
  • โˆ’Mobile app in development

MetaMask

๐Ÿ‘ Pros

  • +Most widely supported wallet
  • +Works with every EVM dApp
  • +Hardware wallet integration
  • +Snaps for extensibility

๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons

  • โˆ’High swap fees (0.875%)
  • โˆ’Slower than competitors
  • โˆ’UI feels dated

Users also compared

Get the best onchain tools in your inbox every week

Join traders and DeFi users who discover new crypto tools, strategies, and alpha every week. Free, no spam.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.